Kamala claims attempts on Trump’s life are no worse than what’s happening to Haitians in Ohio

There have been two attempted assassinations of Donald Trump in as many months.

The most recent happened at his golf course in Palm Beach, Fla., on Sunday. 

Registered Democrat Ryan Wesley Routh, 58, was later arrested and charged with firearms offenses. 

That incident came two months after a shooting at a rally in Butler, Pa., which left the Republican nominee with facial injuries and killed a man in the crowd.

However, Trump has no right to feel unsafe about this—because everyone else is dealing with the same threat level, apparently.

That’s the wisdom of Democrat nominee Kamala Harris, who made the incredulous claim during a fresh serving of word salad, this week.

Speaking at a recent interview with the National Association of Black Journalists in Philadelphia, she said Trump’s near-death experiences at the hands of soy snipers were no worse than what’s happening with “Ohio”, “Project 2025”, and “LGBTQ.”

NEW: Kamala Harris is asked about Secret Service protection after Trump was nearly assass*nated, responds by saying "Ohio", "Project 2025" and "LGBTQ."

Remarkable.

Reporter: "Do you have full confidence in the Secret Service?"

Harris: "I do… but I mean, you can go back to… pic.twitter.com/IB3ynWOZwe

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 17, 2024

Naturally, the vacuous comment raised eyebrows among viewers, and even left her woke interviewers cringing.

“Do you have full confidence in the Secret Service?” they jointly asked her.

“I do… but I mean, you can go back to Ohio,” she replied, clearly veering off script. 

“Not everybody has Secret Service and there are far too many people in our country right now who are not feeling safe. 

“I mean, I look at Project 2025 and I look at, you know, the ‘don’t say gay’ laws coming out of Florida. Members of the LGBTQ community don’t feel safe right now.

“Immigrants or people with an immigrant background don’t feel safe right now. Women don’t feel safe right now. And so, yes, I feel safe.”

At that point, a metaphorical tumbleweed rolled across the studio floor. And rightly so.

See, the examples Harris cited are not comparable to getting caught in the crosshairs of two crazed gunmen. 

First off, Haitians are not being shot. Quite the opposite; they are being vehemently defended by the woke mainstream media—just look at JD Vance’s recent exchange with Dana Bash.

JD Vance tells Dana Bash: "I want to start with something you said which I think is frankly disgusting, and is more appropriate for a Democratic propagandist than it is for an American journalist. There is nothing that I have said that has led to threats against these hospitals." pic.twitter.com/FYNWzyFOcn

— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) September 15, 2024

She denied the legitimacy of any claims regarding pets being eaten, even though several concerns have been raised by local residents.

Secondly, no LGBT people in Florida have been attacked by gunmen because of their sexuality, nor their opposition to Ron DeSantis’ education policy, which has long been mischaracterized into oblivion.

If anything, it was designed to protect youngsters and received plenty of support from gay and straight people.

Thirdly, America is one of the safest places on Earth for women — especially now Hillary’s friends Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein are no longer a threat — and Project 2025 isn’t even a thing.

Trump’s exit of the NABJ after talking with somewhat of a hostile panel; compared to Kamala’s exit after she talked with a rather friendly panel.
Notice any differences? pic.twitter.com/6qpkZmqque

— Jay’V (@JayVTheGreat) September 19, 2024

So, much like her campaign, Harris’ entire argument is a fallacy. But I understand why she said it; her puppeteers are watching and she desperately needs to tow the party line.

If she doesn’t, she’ll contradict the official message from Washington, D.C.

Just a few days ago White House Press Secretary, Karin Jean-Pierre, defended the Democrats’ dog whistle that brands Trump a “threat”.

When quizzed over this practice by journalist Peter Doocy, Jean-Pierre slammed the mere question as “incredibly dangerous”, which is yet more insanity.

KJP rages at Fox's @Pdoocy:

Doocy: "How many more assassination attempts on Donald Trump until the president, vice president, and you pick a different word other than threat?"

KJP: "I disagree with your question." pic.twitter.com/1YSMDwXqnS

— Media Research Center (@theMRC) September 17, 2024

Seriously, how can asking a simple question at a press conference be “dangerous”? And, even if it were, aren’t all the examples he referenced more dangerous? 

Biden has referred to Trump as a “threat” at least eight times on X alone. One time, he labeled him “literally a threat to everything America stands for.”

Another time, he claimed “Trump and MAGA Republicans are a threat to the very soul of this country.”

Isn’t this more inflammatory than asking about inappropriate language choice? Isn’t it a question worth asking?

Either way, it’s certainly not one worth answering. Not if you’re the ultimate diversity hire who’s simultaneously way out of their depth.

But, once again, it makes sense. 

See, questions are indeed dangerous, especially if you’ve got something to hide. And the Democrats have plenty to cover up.

They’re the party that defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s.

Most recently, they performed a coup among their own people by ousting a sitting a president.

No wonder Kamala can’t help but minimize assassination attempts. 

To her, it’s just another day in the life of a Democrat.